Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Partly Cloudy Day 51° Partly Cloudy
News >  Nation/World

Senate approves broad energy bill

Justin Blum Washington Post

WASHINGTON — The Senate Tuesday overwhelmingly approved a broad-based energy bill that would provide tax breaks and incentives to encourage domestic oil and natural gas production but billions more to boost renewable energy sources, nuclear power and conservation.

After years of partisan bickering over energy policy, the Senate struck a bipartisan deal that would benefit the booming oil industry, but that also begins to address the concerns of Democrats and environmentalists that more needs to be done to conserve energy and develop cleaner energy alternatives. For the first time, the Senate has gone on record calling for mandatory limits on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions linked to global warming, although the resolution is not binding on the Bush administration, which opposes mandatory controls.

The final vote was 85 to 12, with 49 Republicans, 35 Democrats and one independent voting in support of the measure.

By contrast, the version of the energy bill that the House approved in April is heavily tilted toward providing incentives for traditional energy production. The House bill also includes protection from defective product lawsuits for manufacturers of the gasoline additive methyl tertiary-butyl ether, or MTBE, that has contaminated drinking water in hundreds of communities. In 2003, the Senate blocked final passage of energy legislation after the House insisted on inclusion of a similar MTBE provision.

President Bush has called on Congress to send him a final bill by August, but the two chambers are far apart on MTBE and several other issues that will complicate negotiations. Bush has sought enactment of comprehensive energy legislation since shortly after taking office in 2001, but twice before lawmakers failed to reach agreement.

Another key difference is the size and beneficiaries of tax breaks. The Senate agreed to provide about $18 billion in tax breaks over 10 years, which is offset by about $4 billion in revenue-generating measures, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. The House tax breaks total $8 billion over 10 years. The Bush administration sought only $6.7 billion in new tax breaks.

Bush said in a statement that the Senate-passed legislation “will help our economic growth by addressing the root causes of high energy prices and reducing our dependence on foreign sources of energy.”

But energy analysts and environmentalists said the bill would provide only modest relief for consumers and do little to reduce oil imports, at a time when oil prices hover around $60 a barrel and gasoline is selling for more than $2 a gallon.

“I don’t think consumers benefit from corporate welfare, and that’s all that these proposals add up to,” said Jerry Taylor, director of natural resource studies at the Cato Institute in Washington, which promotes free-market policies. “With energy prices as high as they are, we don’t need to provide any incentives.”

The United States imports about 58 percent of all the oil it consumes. According to federal projections, that figure will rise steadily in the coming years as domestic production continues to decline — a result of natural depletion of oil fields. Oil prices have been driven up over the past year as economies in China and elsewhere have boomed and supplies have tightened.

Backers of the Senate bill said that they hoped it would spur increased domestic production of oil and natural gas and provide incentives for new technologies and energy sources that eventually could displace oil.

“It should produce new sources of clean energy,” said Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., who as chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee guided the bill through the Senate with the panel’s ranking Democrat, Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M.

But Bingaman cautioned that “this bill does not bring down the price of gasoline at the pump in the near term.”

“In the long term,” he added, “it puts in place good policies that will move us in directions that will be very beneficial to American consumers, American industry and the American economy.”

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe now to get breaking news alerts in your email inbox

Get breaking news delivered to your inbox as it happens.