Female viewing

When her children were young, Jenny Lauck flipped on “Today” or “Good Morning America” as she brewed her morning coffee and tended her babies.

But several years ago, the 34-year-old mother of three stopped watching the morning shows. After getting TiVo, she had no patience to sit through multiple commercial breaks during a live newscast. On top of that, the segments seemed frivolous.

“Watching morning television for me is the equivalent of reading People magazine in the dentist’s office,” says Lauck, who writes for Web sites from her home in Santa Rosa, Calif.

“They don’t have anything new or particularly relevant to my life. It seems like a lot of fluff. I feel like I can get information faster and cleaner on the Internet.”

Lauck is not alone in souring on network morning news programs. In particular, this season has seen a significant erosion of the shows’ demographic sweet spot: 25-to-54-year-old women.

Almost 450,000 of these women – coveted by advertisers because of their household purchasing power – turned off the three broadcast morning programs so far this season, a decline of 10 percent compared to the same point last year, according to a Los Angeles Times analysis of Nielsen Media Research data.

Male viewers the same age also fell by 9 percent, but they make up a smaller portion of the audience.

It’s difficult to trace the exact cause of the drop. It comes after two popular morning hosts, Katie Couric and Charles Gibson, left their shows to be evening news anchors.

At the same time, the advent of “mommy blogs,” the popularity of online news sites and the frantic press of daily life appear to have led many women to forgo morning TV.

If the trend continues, it may have implications not only for morning programs but news divisions as a whole, which rely on profitable shows to finance news-gathering operations.

News executives are calling the dip a short-term fluctuation. They attribute it to the unseasonably mild winter in much of the country, noting that temperate weather draws people outside, away from television.

“We are certainly aware of it, but not making a lot if it just yet,” said Jim Bell, executive producer of NBC’s “Today.”

“I maintain the foundation of the morning is perfectly stable and fine,” he says. “I suspect that when there are big, breaking news stories or significant weather events, we will grow, as we’ve always grown.”

Until recently, morning programs seemed immune to the ratings declines plaguing the evening newscasts. But in the last two seasons, the combined viewership of “Today,” ABC’s “Good Morning America” and CBS’ “The Early Show” leveled off.

Viewership has shrunk by 4 percent this season – a slight drop, but one that suggests the morning programs are vulnerable.

“There was a perception that early morning was bulletproof,” says Bill McOwen, director of national broadcast for the media agency MPG. “Now it’s starting to suffer from what its colleagues in the broadcast realm have dealt with for years: that other options exist.”

It’s a fact familiar to evening newscasts, which have watched their audiences deflate in the last few decades. That pattern continues this season: The number of women watching the three nightly network broadcasts has dropped by 510,000, while male viewers have declined by 334,000.

Even Couric’s arrival at CBS did not substantially boost female viewership. While “CBS Evening News” has drawn about 29,000 more 25-to-54-year-old women this season, an increase of 2 percent, the size of the total female audience hasn’t changed.

“It’s a long process,” says David Poltrack, chief research officer for the CBS Corp., noting that the number of younger women watching has increased more in the last month.

“Katie has made significant advances in connecting with the young female audience,” he says. “Relative to the other guys, we’re making progress there.”

Couric’s rivals still beat her among women ages 25 to 54, even though they have both lost viewers this season. NBC anchor Brian Williams is down 15.5 percent in that demographic, while ABC’s Charles Gibson, who attracts the most women in that age group, has shed 7 percent.

Television news veterans chalk up the waning female viewership to many factors, including the growing migration of women to online news sites and disheartening reports about the war.

“My gut instinct is it may have something to do with Iraq,” says Judy Woodruff, a former CNN anchor and NBC correspondent who now serves as senior correspondent for “The NewsHour With Jim Lehrer” on PBS.

“The news is so negative and so depressing day after day that it may well be that everybody – and especially women, who may be able to identify with the mothers and sisters and daughters – it may be that they’re reacting in this way. The news is not happy.”

For the news divisions, female viewers are crucial – especially when it comes to the morning programs, designed specifically to appeal to mothers who manage their family’s spending.

“Seventy percent of our revenue comes from women 25 to 54,” says Steve Friedman, vice president of morning broadcasts for CBS News. “That’s why these morning shows on the networks have been so feminized. It’s always, ‘How to catch your cheating husband,’ not ‘How to catch your cheating wife.’ “

But many women are turning online to get the parenting and lifestyle information that is the staple of the morning shows. The number of “mommy blogs” in recent years has exploded – now numbering 6,400, according to the blog search engine Technorati – as women use personal Web sites to swap tales about modern motherhood.

“The very issues that typically get covered on the morning shows are very robust and alive in the blogosphere,” says Pete Blackshaw, chief marketing officer for Nielsen BuzzMetrics, which tracks blog trends. “It’s safe to say that the Internet is beginning to cannibalize a lot of these conversational topics.”

Beth Blecherman, a former “Today” viewer and mother of three, says she has rarely watched the morning show since she began blogging on Silicon Valley Moms Blog, a Web site she runs with other mothers in the area.

Instead, the 43-year-old Palo Alto, Calif., resident regularly peruses three dozen other mommy blogs for ideas and support.

“Now that I’ve been blogging, the morning shows feel like they’re staged to me, whereas the mommy blogs are pretty authentic – to the point of being almost too honest some times,” says Blecherman, who does part-time consulting from home.

“It’s a way to get really fresh information from other moms, kind of like a virtual moms group. I don’t see a need to watch the morning shows.”