Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Partly Cloudy Night 39° Partly Cloudy
News >  Nation

U.S. Forest Service didn’t call for pulling its land from Bears Ears, USDA nominee tells Senate Democrats

This May 8, 2017, photo shows an aerial view of Arch Canyon within Bears Ears National Monument in Utah. (Francisco Kjolseth / Associated Press)
This May 8, 2017, photo shows an aerial view of Arch Canyon within Bears Ears National Monument in Utah. (Francisco Kjolseth / Associated Press)
By Juliet Eilperin Washington Post

WASHINGTON – Two senior Senate Democrats want President Donald Trump to explain why he’s poised to remove protections for U.S. Forest Service land in the Bears Ears National Monument when the agency did not recommend any such change, according to a letter obtained by The Washington Post.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow (Mich.), the top Democrat on the Senate Agriculture Committee, and Sen. Michael F. Bennet (Colo.), the ranking Democrat on the Agriculture subcommittee on conservation, forestry and natural resources, made the inquiry Friday after Trump’s nominee to serve as U.S. Department of Agriculture general counsel informed them that the department had not recommended the Interior Department remove any Forest Service acreage from existing national monuments.

There are 289,000 acres of Forest Service land currently in Utah’s Bears Ears, which Trump is poised to shrink Monday by as much as 85 percent, according to draft documents obtained by the Post. Some of that land would be affected under the draft maps Interior has prepared, though officials have cautioned that the final boundaries could still be changed before Trump issues a proclamation on Monday.

In a letter to the president, Stabenow and Bennet write that any effort to remove Forest Service land from either Bears Ears or four California national monuments still under review would be at odds with the agency’s own recommendations to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke.

Trump had asked Zinke to reassess the status of more than two dozen monuments established since 1996. In his report, which the White House has refused to release since its submission in August, Zinke recommended cutting the size of at least four sites and changing the way at least a half-dozen more are managed.

The senators note that USDA nominee Stephen Vaden “indicated that USDA’s submissions to DOI were sent without a recommendation for removing Forest Service acreage from the monuments under review.” And in response to specific questions about Forest Service acres that USDA might have identified for removal, their letter says, “Mr. Vaden reiterated that, ‘No specific acres were recommended.’”

Trump and his deputies have argued that many of the national monuments designated by previous presidents under the 1906 Antiquities Act were overly broad given what needed to be protected. One of the most contentious has been the 1.35 million-acres Bears Ears, which President Barack Obama established nearly a year ago to safeguard tens of thousands of ancestral Pueblo archaeological sites as well as rock art and areas where tribes continue to conduct ceremonies.

In their letter, Stabenow and Bennet ask Trump to answer a series of questions by Dec. 15 on which acres of Forest Service land he intends to remove from monument status in Bears Ears and the four California national monuments under scrutiny. Those include Berryessa Snow Mountain, San Gabriel Mountains, Giant Sequoia and Sand to Snow national monuments.

Several legal scholars believe Trump lacks the legal authority to change national monument boundaries. The lawmakers ask him to address the issue and to “please provide a citation for any such legal authority.”

USDA could not be immediately reached Friday for comment on the letter.

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe now to get breaking news alerts in your email inbox

Get breaking news delivered to your inbox as it happens.