Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Three big banks rake in better-than-expected profits

JPMorgan Chase & Co. – the entrance to its Manhattan headquarters shown here – reported a $14.5 billion profit in the second quarter.  (New York Times)
By Rob Copeland</p><p>and Stacy Cowley New York Times

Three of the biggest banks in the United States made a cumulative $22.3 billion in profit last quarter, a hefty jump from the same period last year, the lenders reported Friday.

The largest bank in the nation, JPMorgan Chase & Co., led the way with $14.5 billion in profit, helped by growth virtually across the board, including increases in lending and credit-card transactions. Wells Fargo pulled in $4.9 billion and Citi earned $2.9 billion. All of the earnings were higher than analysts had expected.

Given its size, JPMorgan in particular is a proxy for the banking industry at large. CEO Jamie Dimon has deep political connections, and his prognostications on the economy are scrutinized in some circles as closely as a central banker’s musings.

On Friday, Dimon told analysts that he expected the U.S. economy to experience “a soft landing, mild recession or a hard recession,” although he didn’t put a time frame on the prediction. “Obviously, we shall hope for the best,” he said.

In its latest report, the bank listed a litany of risks, including that consumers are burning through their cash buffers and that inflation remains high. Last quarter, JPMorgan lost $900 million on investments in U.S. Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities, which have dropped in value as rates have risen – but that was barely a dent in its results.

Wells Fargo, one of the nation’s largest mortgage lenders, is watched by analysts for signs of economic stress. The U.S. economy “continues to perform better than many had expected,” said Wells Fargo CEO Charles W. Scharf.

The bank said Friday that soured loans in its commercial business increased, but its consumer business held fairly steady with a slight rise in credit-card defaults offset by a drop in losses on auto loans. Commercial real estate, especially loans on office space, are a pain point, and the bank set aside nearly $1 billion more for losses.

Unlike the other banks, Citigroup reported a fall in second-quarter profit, although the decline was not as severe as analysts had predicted. “The long-awaited rebound in investment banking has yet to materialize, making for a disappointing quarter,” Citi CEO Jane Fraser said in a statement.

The three major banks have been all over the news this year, thanks to their prominent role attempting to be a stabilizing force during the spring banking crisis that felled three smaller lenders. JPMorgan bought one of those failed banks, First Republic. In an indication of how troubled that institution had become, JPMorgan said Friday that it was setting aside $1.2 billion to deal with losses in First Republic’s lending portfolio.

Analysts still expect the acquisition to prove worthy in the end, thanks to First Republic’s base of wealthy clients and coastal branches, which Friday’s results show are already buoying JPMorgan’s asset and wealth management arms.

The U.S. government debt-limit standoff in April and May was also reflected in the banks’ results, with Citi citing anxiety during the negotiations as pushing investment-banking clients to the “sidelines” during the second quarter.

In the next week or so, a slew of other banks will report quarterly earnings. Among the most closely watched will be Wednesday’s results from Goldman Sachs, which has hinted publicly of a disappointing stretch, and regional banks including Western Alliance and Comerica, which will be looking to prove they have bounced back from their recent troubles.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.