Not the conventional wisdom
“The state can save approximately $3 million in total funds over the next two and a half years,” Dave Butler, deputy director of management services for the department, told the Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee. “We feel we can provide better service to the public as well as the divisions that we serve.”
Butler, who just joined the state a year ago after a career at Albertson’s, said when the state contracted out the work, it was a boom time for the high-tech business. “Y2K had us all scared,” he said. “I.T. professionals were in demand, commanding premium salaries on the open market.”
Since then, there’s been the dot-com bust, and a flood of new information-technology professionals entered the market. Demand, and wages, have dropped.
Butler said when he broached the idea earlier to lawmakers, they asked him “why I want to increase the size of government.” As a private-sector guy, he said, he’s learning that many judge the size of government by the number of employees. But if a higher employee count means less spending of taxpayer money, he said, “then I think it’s a benefit to each and every one of us.”
Lawmakers were leery. “You go against every magazine I get that says privatization of government services is the only way to go out there,” said Rep. Maxine Bell, R-Jerome, JFAC co-chair.
Sen. Brent Hill, R-Rexburg, an accountant, said he wants to see all the figures. “I commend you for trying to save money – I think that’s wonderful,” he said. “I don’t want to discourage you in that in any way.”