Taxpayers may break even on banks, analysts say, but outlook’s dim on carmakers
WASHINGTON – A gaggle of big banks have repaid their loans to the government under the $700 billion financial rescue. Is there a chance taxpayers will eventually recoup the rest of the money spent on this and other bailouts – and maybe even take in a little profit?
Here are some questions and answers about recovering bailout money.
Q.Which banks have repaid their government loans?
A.The government injected capital into hundreds of banks under the Treasury Department program set up in October after the financial system – and U.S. officials – peered into the abyss of collapse. In June, banks began repaying the money they received under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. The “repayers” so far include some of the nation’s biggest and best-known banks.
Among them: JPMorgan Chase & Co., Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc., U.S. Bancorp, American Express Co., BB&T Corp., Bank of New York Mellon Corp. and Northern Trust Corp.
Q.Did the government earn any profits when the money was paid back?
A.The government has made around $4 billion in profits from the eight above institutions and another $35 million from 14 smaller banks, according to calculations by the New York Times in a report published Sunday.
In return for the government aid, the banks issued the Treasury warrants to buy their common stock at a set price over the next 10 years, and preferred shares carrying a 5 percent annual dividend rate.
The government’s profits come from those dividends and increases in stock prices.
Q.So it’s all good, right? The government is getting a healthy return on its emergency investment in the banks?
A.Not exactly. While some banks that received TARP money have paid it back, many haven’t – including banking giants Citigroup Inc. and Bank of America Corp., which each received $45 billion. Some of the banks may never repay the money.
And there is the possibility of big losses for the government on its rescues of mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (combined $96.3 billion so far), insurance conglomerate American International Group Inc. ($182 billion), and carmakers General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group LLC (combined $65 billion).
For the bank bailout, “It’s probably a break-even for the government,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Economy.com. While some big banks quickly repaid, some of the small and midsize institutions that received aid are likely to fail and the government won’t recoup all its investment there, he said.
Q.Right. But didn’t government leaders say there wouldn’t be a loss on the investment when they asked Congress for the bailout money last fall?
A.They did, though profit was the least concern at a time when financial disaster was at hand and the economic ship needed to be righted.
Q.What about the auto bailout in particular? What are the chances the government will recover its investment there?
A.The Congressional Budget Office has given a pessimistic outlook for a full refund, estimating recently that only about $15 billion of the initial $55 billion to GM, Chrysler, its financing arms and suppliers would be repaid. The analysis didn’t include the $30 billion GM received to help it navigate bankruptcy.
Administration officials say they want to dispose of the government’s ownership interests as soon as practicable.
FISHING -- Game On! for sockeye and chinook anglers on the upper Columbia River near Brewster. Apparently the Okanogan River has finally warmed up enough to form a thermal barrier ...
Early yesterday, I thought the Democrats would have trouble uniting behind Hillary Clinton going forward from their national convention. After listening to First Lady Michelle Obama and U.S. Sen. Bernie ...
A GRIP ON SPORTS • It’s great to be back home. To sleep in the correct bed, to awake at 5 in the morning to the singing of birds, to ...
A) Quite a bit. B) Not at all. C) The Seahawks used to train in Cheney? D) Other.
sponsored According to two 2015 surveys, 62 percent of Americans do not have enough savings to handle an unexpected emergency, much less any long-term plans.