January 2, 2011 in Nation/World

New year seen as crucial in war

Despite more troops and claims of progress, major hurdles remain
Laura King Los Angeles Times
 

U.S. soldier Joe Hulscher walks by a sign that reads “Happy New Year 2011” at Camp Phoenix in Kabul, Afghanistan, on Friday.
(Full-size photo)(All photos)

By the numbers

498: Number of U.S. troops killed in Afghanistan in 2010

702: Number of foreign troops, including Americans, killed in Afghanistan in 2010

504: Number of foreign troops, including Americans, killed in Afghanistan in 2009

KABUL, Afghanistan – A U.S. troop buildup in 2010 was meant to blunt the momentum of the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan. Now it is 2011 that has become the make-or-break year.

U.S. and NATO officials have sought to put a positive face on the last 12 months of fighting here, citing significant military gains in the Taliban’s southern heartland, a concerted campaign of strikes targeting the insurgents’ midlevel field command, and the growth of the NATO force to levels at last deemed adequate to the task at hand.

“We are convinced … that we are actually making progress; we have proven that progress is possible,” German Brig. Gen. Josef Blotz, a spokesman for NATO’s International Security Assistance Force, told journalists in Kabul last month. “We will keep up the pressure on the insurgency.”

But some ominous developments, both on and off the battlefield, bode ill for the new year.

The Taliban made deep inroads into swaths of the country previously regarded as relatively safe – the north, northwest and center – eroding confidence in the West’s ability to protect the Afghan populace and hampering aid and reconstruction efforts. A parliamentary election in September intended as a democratic showpiece devolved into fraud and chaos. Corruption tightened its grip on the government of President Hamid Karzai.

By midsummer, combat casualties among U.S. troops and the NATO force as a whole had already reached their highest annual levels of the war. On Friday, the American military toll stood just short of a grim milestone: 498 deaths, according to the independent website icasualties.org – more than the previous two years put together.

Altogether, Western troops suffered more than 700 fatalities in 2010, heightening unease on the part of European governments keenly aware of the war’s unpopularity at home. While the NATO allies presented a united front at a conference in November, the Americans – whose troops make up two-thirds of the 150,000-member Western force – privately fretted over the likelihood of the United States shouldering an even larger share of the military burden in coming years.

As violence burgeoned, civilian casualties did too, jumping by 20 percent in the first 10 months of 2010 compared with the same period in the previous year, according to the United Nations. Most of the 2,412 noncombatant deaths in that period were attributed to the Taliban. But many Afghans tend to place the overall blame on Western forces, seeing their presence as a magnet for insurgent attacks that kill and injure civilians.

With both the Taliban and the West promising to intensify their military actions in the months ahead, civilians will continue to take the brunt of suicide attacks and roadside bombings that haunt daily life in many parts of the country, officials have warned. On Friday, local officials near Kandahar reported that insurgents threw hand grenades into two homes in a still-unexplained attack that killed a child and wounded six other people.

“Sometimes we feel there is simply nowhere safe for us,” said Samira Khan, a teacher in Kandahar province, a focal point of the fighting. “We keep waiting for life to get better, but it always seems we have to wait some more.”

At the outset of 2010, Kandahar was declared a testing ground for the U.S.-spearheaded military push in the south. After months of delays, Western forces did manage to drive the Taliban out of key districts surrounding Kandahar city, which the movement regards as its spiritual home.

But the offensive did not begin in earnest until late summer, postponed in part after U.S. officials recognized the difficulties of bringing security and governance to the much smaller town of Marjah, in neighboring Helmand province, the scene of an earlier U.S. Marines-led campaign.

The durability of gains touted in Kandahar province will probably not be apparent until springtime, Western commanders have acknowledged. Much depends on whether the insurgents are able to regroup and rearm over the winter in their traditional sanctuaries in Pakistan.

The insurgents’ havens in Pakistan’s tribal areas became somewhat less safe with a dramatic increase in strikes by U.S. drones over the last year. But President Barack Obama’s year-end war review, issued almost exactly 12 months after he ordered the 30,000-troop buildup, was sharply critical of Pakistan’s inaction against militants sheltering on its soil.

U.S. officials still publicly insist that the July 2011 target for the start of a troop drawdown from Afghanistan has not been abandoned. But a new date, 2014, has come to the fore. That is when it is hoped that Afghan security forces will be ready to take the lead in safeguarding the country.

Although intensive recruitment efforts have swelled the Afghan police and army to a quarter-million, their Western trainers must grapple with an array of problems in the ranks: drug abuse, illiteracy, ethnic tensions and the occasional violent and unexpected display of loyalty to the Taliban.

Even Western officials who describe an improving picture in Afghanistan, such as Staffan de Mistura, the head of the U.N. mission here, acknowledge that the coming year is likely to be difficult.

“Our assessment,” he told the Nations Security Council last week, “is before it gets better, it may get worse.”

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus