Gay marriage measure added to defense bill

WASHINGTON – Wading into the gay marriage debate, the Republican-led House tacked a provision banning same-sex marriages at military chapels onto a sweeping defense bill that is now headed to the Senate.

Despite the high-octane public discussion over gay marriage that has intensified since President Barack Obama announced his support for same-sex marriage, the issue has been one that Capitol Hill has largely sought to avoid. But the GOP majority led Congress into the issue by adding the same-sex marriage prohibitions to the defense bill.

The annual National Defense Authorization Act, approved Friday on a 299-120 vote, is a traditionally bipartisan effort that can prove difficult for lawmakers to oppose. The bill includes a 1.7 percent annual pay raise for the troops but also is loaded with politically charged extras.

In passing the $554 billion measure, lawmakers broke the budget agreement Congress made last summer with the Obama administration – beefing up military spending $8 billion beyond the agreed-upon limit. The White House threatened a veto.

Intense debate surrounded a bipartisan amendment to prevent the indefinite detention of terrorist suspects, including U.S. citizens or those captured or detained in the U.S. It was rejected. Instead, the House agreed to prohibit the transfer of military detainees from the facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States, and approved a provision reaffirming that all detainees have the right to a trial.

The bill addresses gay marriage with two provisions. One would ban performing gay marriages on any facility owned by the military. Another would protect military chaplains from punishment if they declined to marry a gay couple.

The Department of Defense had opened the door to gay weddings on bases in a memo last September after Congress repealed the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, which barred gays from openly serving in the military. The policy change said chaplains were allowed to perform same-sex marriages but noted they could not be required to.

Gay-rights groups said they were monitoring the bill closely and expected that the Senate would not allow the gay marriage restrictions to stand.