April 30, 2014 in Nation/World

Wisconsin’s voter ID law tossed out

Los Angeles Times
 

A federal judge struck down a Wisconsin voter ID law as unconstitutional because it imposed an unfair burden on the poor and minorities, a move that could set a precedent for other voting rights cases to be decided this election year.

The Wisconsin law, passed in 2011, required voters without ID – many of whom are minorities – to overcome large obstacles to obtain a photo ID to be able to vote, U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman wrote in his opinion Wednesday. That violates the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection, he said.

“It is likely that a substantial number of the 300,000-plus voters who lack a qualifying ID will be deterred from voting,” he wrote.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who is up for re-election in November, said on Twitter that he believed the voter ID law was constitutional and “will ultimately be upheld.”

The state attorney general, J.B. Van Hollen, said in a statement that he planned to appeal.

Voting rights advocates hailed the ruling as a turning point after years of setbacks, including a Supreme Court decision striking down parts of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. They hope they win similar cases soon in North Carolina and Texas.

It is the third victory for voting rights advocates in the span of a week: A Pennsylvania state judge declined to reconsider his January ruling striking down a voter ID law, and a judge in Arkansas struck down that state’s voter ID law. (Late Tuesday, however, the Arkansas Supreme Court placed a temporary stay on that ruling.)

The Wisconsin decision is especially significant because it came in federal court and because Adelman relied on Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in his decision. Previously, voting rights advocates had used Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act to argue election-fairness cases, but the Supreme Court voided that option in its Shelby vs. Holder decision, said Jessica Levinson, a professor of election law at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. The Wisconsin case shows that using Section 2, which bans rules that make it more difficult for minorities to participate in the political process, can be effective.

“For proponents of voter ID laws, this is somewhat encouraging,” Levinson said. “The courts are finding that evidence of fraud is not there, and that these laws place disproportionate burdens on certain segments of the population.”

Several states passed voter ID laws after the 2010 elections, when conservatives made big gains in state legislatures. Currently, 31 states require voters to show some form of ID at the polls.

Get stories like this in a free daily email


Please keep it civil. Don't post comments that are obscene, defamatory, threatening, off-topic, an infringement of copyright or an invasion of privacy. Read our forum standards and community guidelines.

You must be logged in to post comments. Please log in here or click the comment box below for options.

comments powered by Disqus