January 7, 2014 in Idaho

Idaho education a priority in Gov. Butch Otter’s budget

By The Spokesman-Review
 
Other Otter proposals

Among Idaho Gov. Butch Otter’s other proposals, which now will be debated by lawmakers during their session that runs through March:

• A new $2 million state Wolf Control Fund, which also would get donations from sportsmen and the cattle industry.

• Adding a second year to the University of Idaho’s law school program in Boise – which now includes only the third year of law school.

• $15 million for one-time state water projects, including $500,000 for studies of the Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer.

• Continued funding for a controversial statewide Wi-Fi contract for high schools. The initial funding was a one-year, one-time appropriation, but in the governor’s proposed budget, the continued funding would be covered by an ongoing $10.4 million annual allocation for school technology.

• Steadfast support for the new Idaho Core Standards, setting expectations for what students should learn at each grade level in math and language arts. Lawmakers approved the standards in 2011, but some have now changed their minds.

• State support for startup of the Kootenai Family Medical Residency in July 2014. The $200,000 program would train family physicians, starting with six first-year residents.

BOISE – Education is the top priority for Idaho for the coming year, Gov. Butch Otter declared Monday, coming even ahead of tax cuts for businesses and the wealthy.

“Any effort to provide additional tax relief for our citizens must be in the context of advancing our goals for Idaho’s education system,” the governor told a joint session of the Legislature in his State of the State message.

What that means: Otter has set aside $30 million in his budget proposal for some form of tax relief. But he’s done so with a caveat, that his education improvement proposals must come first.

Those include $54.7 million toward carrying out some of the recommendations of an education task force Otter convened in the wake of voters’ rejection last year of school reform laws. Otter proposed putting $35 million toward restoring the $82 million-plus in annual operational funding cut from Idaho schools during the economic downturn, plus funding for technology, professional development for teachers and more.

But he’s not proposing any raises for teachers – a key centerpiece of the task force’s plan – nor is he proposing funding raises for any of Idaho’s state employees, despite a new report showing state employee pay has fallen to 19 percent below market rates.

State schools Superintendent Tom Luna, a fellow Republican, criticized Otter’s proposed budget as a $21 million cut in teacher pay. That’s because this year’s budget includes $21 million in one-time bonuses for teachers that aren’t repeated next year and aren’t replaced with anything else.

“The governor’s budget proposes reducing overall teacher compensation in order to help schools pay the light bill. I cannot support that,” Luna said. “I believe we have the funding and the plan to accomplish both, and I will fight to ensure we continue to improve teacher compensation this year and in the future.”

The task force proposed major boosts to teacher pay, but those would come as part of a new teacher career ladder and tiered licensing structure that’s not been developed.

If the education proposals are funded, Otter offered lawmakers some examples of tax cuts he’d consider: further trimming Idaho’s top individual and corporate income tax rates, and increasing the personal property tax exemption for business equipment, enacted last year, from $100,000 to $250,000.

Overall, Otter proposed a $2.88 billion budget for next year in state general funds, a 3.7 percent increase from the current year’s $2.78 billion. But that includes a number of one-time expenditures, including deposits into rainy-day funds.

“I’m sure some will argue that the proposals I’m putting forward today are not bold enough, not front-loaded enough or simply not enough,” Otter told lawmakers. But he said his proposals are “conservative, sustainable policies.”

Rep. Kathy Sims, R-Coeur d’Alene, said she won’t be convinced until she sees the details. “I’m just going to add it up and see how much we’re really growing government,” she said.

Otter drew applause when he announced that he won’t support expanding the state’s Medicaid program in the coming year – at least not until the state knows much more about what it would get.

Rep. Ron Mendive, R-Coeur d’Alene, said he was relieved.

But Sen. Shawn Keough, R-Sandpoint, cautioned that people in her district don’t want to see property tax increases, which is the current source that funds the state’s program for people who can’t pay their catastrophic medical bills. “To the degree that Medicaid could address that, I think people want us to take a look at it,” she said.


There are eight comments on this story. Click here to view comments >>

Get stories like this in a free daily email