Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

California gets tough on water-wasting agencies

Gov. Jerry Brown talks to reporters at the end of a meeting on the drought, with agricultural, environmental and urban water agency leaders from across California at his Capitol office in Sacramento, Calif., Wednesday. At right is Brown’s executive secretary, Nancy McFadden. (Associated Press)
Fenit Nirappil Associated Press

SACRAMENTO, Calif. – California is done with gentle nudges and polite reminders to deal with its drought.

State regulators are naming and shaming local water departments that have let water wasters slide – and forcing agencies to slash water use by as much as a third. They say it’s necessary as California reservoirs, and the snow on mountains that is supposed to refill them, reach record lows.

The drought has no clear end in sight, but it’s up to hundreds of local agencies, from small irrigation districts to the city of Los Angeles, to make sure California has enough water to get through it.

Since Gov. Jerry Brown declared a drought emergency last year, they’ve largely taken a soft, educational approach to curtail water use. That’s no longer enough, he says.

In response, state regulators have drafted plans that show how much each community has conserved and assign mandatory water reduction targets. A third of the water departments must make the deepest 35 percent cuts because they have high water use.

“It’s going to require some major changes in how those communities think about, use and manage their water, but it is possible,” said Heather Cooley of the nonprofit Pacific Institute.

The excuses cities have given for pitiful conservation, including hot weather and earlier cutbacks, are no longer a free pass.

That means Los Angeles – which has a million more people than it did 40 years ago, but uses the same amount of water – would have to cut its use by a fifth.

Ways to meet these ambitious targets can include carrots such as rebates for ripping up lawns and sticks that include fines for water waste and increased rates for overconsumption.

Those who don’t meet the targets or take steps to conserve face $10,000-a-day fines if they don’t adopt new water restrictions or change rates as demanded by the state, although regulators have been wary of using similar powers before.

State officials say residential conservation through turning off the sprinklers, taking shorter showers and doing less laundry is the most effective way to boost statewide water supplies, even though residents use less than a fifth of California’s surface and groundwater supplies.

Not all cities were at risk of running out of water and didn’t feel the same pressure to conserve. Some had enough water in local storage to weather the drought. Other local elected officials risked the wrath of constituents for hiking rates or imposing far-reaching restrictions.

“If it’s the state telling them what they have to do, that takes the heat off of local officials,” said Ellen Hanak, a water expert at the Public Policy Institute of California.

The new strategy is a result of Brown’s executive order to change water consumption. Brown met privately for three hours Wednesday with representatives from water agencies, agricultural interests and environmental groups.

“The challenge here, aside from getting the water, is to merely collaborate together and not try to blame other people and point fingers,” Brown told reporters.