Bridge
On today’s deal South decided to take out insurance by bidding four spades over four hearts and reaped a generous reward when the defense slipped.
West led his singleton diamond against four spades, and on winning East’s queen with his ace, declarer thoughtfully continued with a club to dummy’s ace and a club ruff, starting to eliminate the side suits. Then he played a spade, won by West. The defense’s next move was critical. In fact, West made the natural play when he exited with a third club, ruffed by South, who continued with another spade. In with the spade king, West was finally endplayed. He chose to exit with a fourth club, which declarer ruffed with his last trump in hand, throwing the losing heart from dummy. Now he simply played on diamonds until East ruffed with the spade ace, but at that point declarer had the rest, losing just three trump tricks.
West should have worked out that he was very unlikely to set the contract unless his partner produced the spade ace. So he should have planned his defense around that possibility. The contract is defeated if, at trick five, West cashes his second spade honor before getting off lead with a club. Declarer plays on diamonds, but when East ruffs in with the spade ace, he can return a heart through declarer’s queen.
Incidentally, West might have had an even better idea of the diamond position if East had played small at trick one!
Bid with the aces
South holds:
| “A 10 2 | |
| “10 8 7 2 | |
| “Q 4 | |
| “K 10 7 4 |
| South | West | North | East |
| 1 “ | Dbl. | ||
| ? |
Answer: Respond one no-trump. If your RHO had passed, you would have bid one heart (though one no-trump also makes sense), but when you are warned of bad splits, you do not need to introduce a bad four-card major here. One no-trump shows 7-10; reserve a redouble for a hand with more game interest than this.