Lawmakers propose plan to solve education funding problem by 2017

SEATTLE – After spending years debating possible ways out of the quagmire of state education funding, lawmakers from both parties and both houses announced Friday they may have a plan to fix the way the state pays for education.

Some would call it a plan for a plan, since the proposal still doesn’t say how the Legislature will fix the most vexing part of the education funding problem: overreliance on local school levies to pay for basic education.

Four years after the Supreme Court ruled the way the state pays for education is unconstitutional, the Washington Legislature is still debating how to respond to the court. They are working under a contempt order and a daily $100,000 fine until they finish responding to the so-called McCleary decision.

They have added more than $2billion to the education budget – setting aside more money for all-day kindergarten, smaller classes in younger grades, pupil transportation and classroom supplies and equipment. But they’ve left the most complex challenge for last.

The proposed bill that was supposed to address the states’ overreliance on local levies promises a solution, but not until 2017.

The plan, which is likely to change during debates in both houses, is short and simple:

It establishes a new task force to continue the work of the bipartisan group of lawmakers who have been meeting since the 2015 legislative session.

It demands data from the school districts on how they use their local levy money, so lawmakers can figure out how much is going toward basic education.

It sets aside money for analysis of that data.

It makes a commitment toward figuring out a way to do something about levies next year.

“It is taking more time than I would like,” acknowledged House Majority Leader Pat Sullivan, D-Covington, on Thursday. “The fact is there is more work that needs to be done.”

Another member who worked on the bill, Sen. Ann Rivers, R-La Center, said the bill offers a framework that lawmakers can work with this session.

“We have to stop thinking about a silver bullet approach to funding education,” she said. “What you’re going to see is a multifaceted approach.”