Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper
Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883

Survey sheds light on discriminatory climbing route names

From wire reports and SNEWS recently collaborated on a survey addressing climbing route names, particularly those that have been flagged as discriminatory or offensive. The goal of the survey was to understand the opinions of those in the outdoor industry – both adventurers and mountain guides – and bring attention to the issue.

57Hours founder Viktor Marohnic said, “As a company that strongly supports the current racial justice movements, we were especially curious to understand how widespread this issue is, and whether people think these routes should be renamed.”

The results speak for themselves.

Racist route names encountered by most adventurers

SNEWS put out a one-question survey asking readers if they’ve encountered a racist route name while climbing. An astounding 91% (516 voters) replied, “Yes, several times.”

57Hours asked the same question to their network of guides and, similarly, 81% commented that they have at least once encountered a route name they considered to be racist, sexist, discriminatory or otherwise offensive.

57Hours also continued with a more extensive survey, digging deeper into questions like whether the prevalence of certain route names deter women and BIPOC (Black and Indigenous people of color) from participating in adventure sports like climbing and mountain biking, and 43% agreed that was the case. One survey responder commented, “When we enter the sport, they’re subtle reminders that add to a feeling of not really belonging.”

Renaming routes in light of discriminatory names

57Hours also asked their network of mountain guides if they avoid certain routes because of the names, such as while guiding families or adventuring with women or BIPOC. Twenty-three percent said they would avoid the route altogether, and 16% said they won’t mention the name to their clients.

Among those polled, 75% agreed that any route names that are considered to be discriminatory should be renamed, with 87% agreeing that the First Ascensionist(s) should first be given the opportunity to rename the route.

Working toward inclusion

As a final question, 57Hours asked their network of mountain guides if they feel that outdoor spaces are inclusive to everyone. The overwhelming sentiment was, “They should be, but they are not.”

It’s acknowledged that there’s much work to be done to make the outdoors an inclusive space. The discriminatory nature of route names plays into this formula of exclusion.

In the same way that Confederate statues and racial slurs are being actively removed from modern culture, a process of renaming certain routes should follow suit as an act of standing in solidarity with racial justice movements.

As one respondent said, “It should be the responsibility of the community to provide an inclusive environment,” and that begins with reevaluating some of these route names.