Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
Partly Cloudy Night 56° Partly Cloudy
A&E

Miss Manners 7/30

By Judith Martin, Nicholas Ivor Martin and Jacobina Martin ANDREWS MCMEEL SYNDICATION

DEAR MISS MANNERS: I am afraid I did a bad thing, and I am not sure how to fix it – or even if I should try.

We have a family member, an elderly woman in poor health, who has an addictive personality. She has overcome substance abuse but has substituted other destructive habits. The hallmarks of her behavior include poor decision-making that leads to financial hardship and a huge sense of entitlement.

We do not mind helping, say, with a month of Meals on Wheels when she is down on her luck, but we recognize that enabling her beyond ensuring she has the essentials for survival is a bad idea. So we are constantly saying no to outrageous demands for money and luxuries – things that would be far beyond our means and that, in truth, would not satisfy her cravings or make her happy. At least not for long. We try to be firm, but polite and calm.

She came up with a new expectation – the biggest, most shocking and selfish yet – and she presented it in front of a group and during a conversation that had nothing to do with her situation. It took me by surprise, and for the first time ever, I answered without thinking, just blurting out what I really thought.

My answer was brief, and I did not attack her character or raise my voice, though my shock was evident. But I spoke my unfiltered truth.

I know it hurt her deeply, and since I said it in front of her friends, it was undoubtedly humiliating for her. I do care about this lady, though I disagree with her lifestyle choices and her ethics. I do not want to be the cause of a family rift.

But nor do I wish to back away from the clear point I made: that we will not be used and taken advantage of. How would Miss Manners handle this challenging situation?

GENTLE READER: “I am sorry that I spoke sharply. That was wrong. But I am afraid that we are not in a position to help with certain situations – and this one struck me as particularly extreme.”

Your relative may well take this as a financial declaration and choose to challenge it. But Miss Manners assures you that you do not need to defend the specifics of your position – just that you have the right to politely assert one.

DEAR MISS MANNERS: We have eight chairs around a long table in our old farmhouse in the country. Should the extra chairs be removed for dinner when not in use? For example, if we host a dinner with only one other couple, should four chairs be taken down to the cellar?

In the city, I would remove the chairs. Somehow here, it just doesn’t look quite right when only four chairs are around such a big old table. I’m torn and would be most grateful for your guidance.

GENTLE READER: With a long table and fewer guests, the diners may be seated around one end, no chair removal necessary. Miss Manners concedes that this arrangement is less formal – but so is spitting on your food while trying to shout across a dinner table.

Send your questions to Miss Manners at her website missmanners.com.

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe to the Spokane7 email newsletter

Get the day’s top entertainment headlines delivered to your inbox every morning.