Arrow-right Camera
The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper The Spokesman-Review

Spokane, Washington  Est. May 19, 1883
News >  Spokane

Spin Control: Who won Wednesday’s secretary of state debate? Beats me

After moderating Wednesday’s secretary of state debate at Spokane Falls Community College, several people asked me, “Who won?”

Not on television, fortunately, while I was squinting into the lights of a camera and hooked up to an audio feed to the newsroom at KHQ, which was live broadcasting that debate and the impending governor’s debate. Dan Kleckner was kind enough not to ask, possibly because he’s moderated debates, too.

Most moderators will tell you that they are the least likely people in the entire universe to figure out who won the debate they were in the middle of. I spent the hour watching the clock to make sure neither candidate talked longer than the allotted time – neither did, but both were very good at using every second they had – and figuring out who was getting the next question and what that question would be, while listening to the answers to the current question.

There’s also the video factor. Debates look different to people watching on TV than they do to people in the room.

One reader asked why someone else wrote the newspaper’s story of that debate. The ethical reason is reporters don’t write about something in which they are involved. The practical reason is no one can take the notes necessary to write a story while doing all the things a moderator is supposed to do. KHQ’s Sean Owsley moderated the governor’s debate, which allowed me to slip into the back row of the theater reserved for the news media and settle down to a more familiar reporter’s role: listening to the candidates and monitoring their campaigns’ tweets and news releases in which each side claimed a smashing victory.

So I can’t tell you who won the secretary of state debate, other than maybe the public, which often doesn’t see a debate for that office broadcast live to much of the state and available online for the rest of it.

But I can tell you the most unusual thing about the whole event. Before a debate, there’s a coin toss to see who gets to have the first opening statement or the last closing statement. Strategists can disagree on which is the more important, but those two slots are the most coveted because they have the best chance to stick in people’s minds unless one candidate hits the other with the equivalent of “I served with John Kennedy and you’re no John Kennedy.”

Fifteen minutes before the debate, staff from one of the sponsors, the Association of Washington Business, took me down to the hallway between dressing areas for the toss. As Kim Wyman and Tina Podlodowski approached from different ends of the hall, one thing was obvious.

They were wearing practically the same outfit. Podlodowski had a red blazer over a black top and black slacks. Wyman had a red blazer over a black top and black skirt. And while there are many shades of red, the color of these jackets was so similar the thread could have come from the same dye lot.

I think that hue on the palette is known as “Nancy Reagan red.” It is somewhere between “Donald Trump ball cap red” and “Network television election map Republican red.”

It broke the tension. Everybody laughed, and we flipped the coin.

One other debate thing

Various political geeks and some news media colleagues who were watching the debate online through a live feed from the SFCC theater knew something that neither I nor the live audience knew: In the minutes before the event started, the online camera feed was showing me backstage, where the microphone was live.

Some assumed – correctly – that I wasn’t paying attention to the live mic, and were waiting to see if I’d utter some inappropriate expletive or knock over a water bottle as the lecterns were moved into place and wires taped down.

Only by the grace of God, I did not.

Random factoid

Among the avalanche of studies and statistics that showed up in the inbox last week was this one: Nationwide, American millennials are more likely to live with their parents than anywhere else, a new study says.

This is particularly true in big cities where housing costs are soaring, and they can’t find apartments because slightly older residents can’t find affordable homes that would allow them to move out of the apartments millennials could occupy. Those with high college and credit card debt are also more likely to stay at home because that’s all they can afford.

The study comes with state-by-state comparison, which shows this is a bigger problem on the East Coast than the Northwest. In Washington, an estimated 26.4 percent of people ages 18-35 were living with their parents in 2014, which is up from 18.2 percent in 2000. That’s higher than Idaho, at 23.6 percent, or Oregon, at 24.1 percent, the study said. For a link to the full story and the map, go to the Spin Control blog.

Spin Control, a weekly column by political reporter Jim Camden, also appears online with daily items and reader comments at spincontrol.

The Spokesman-Review Newspaper

Local journalism is essential.

Give directly to The Spokesman-Review's Northwest Passages community forums series -- which helps to offset the costs of several reporter and editor positions at the newspaper -- by using the easy options below. Gifts processed in this system are not tax deductible, but are predominately used to help meet the local financial requirements needed to receive national matching-grant funds.

Active Person

Subscribe now to get breaking news alerts in your email inbox

Get breaking news delivered to your inbox as it happens.